CrossModel
Back to model catalog

Tencent · Model guide

Hy3

tencent/hy3
Modalities
TextText
Context
256K
Max output
128K
Tencent Hunyuan Hy3

A production-tuned MoE model refined on real product feedback

Context window
256,000
tokens
Max output
128,000
tokens
Parameter scale
295B
21B active · MoE 192 experts
Coding & agents
Cross-file development and front-end tasks, clear gains over Preview
Reliability
Hallucination rate down ~50%, ~44% in long-doc/RAG scenarios
Production proof
Success rates validated live in WorkBuddy, ima, and WeGame

`reasoning_effort` supports no_think / low / high; the GA release uses flat, non-tiered pricing.

Overview

Tencent Hunyuan Hy3 opened weights and was announced as Hy3 Preview on April 23, 2026. Tencent shipped the general-availability release on July 6, 2026, refined using real product feedback from Yuanbao, ima, and WorkBuddy, with steadier coding-agent behavior, long-document understanding, and multi-turn context handling — Tencent describes it as better suited to front-end tasks and cross-file code development. The architecture is unchanged from Preview — a 295B total / 21B active MoE with 192 experts (top-8 activation) plus a 3.8B MTP speculative-decoding layer — and the GA gains come from three months of further post-training: more post-training compute, higher-quality and more diverse task data, and finer-grained hallucination detection and constraints. It remains Apache 2.0 licensed for free commercial use.

Key capabilities

DimensionDetail
Context window256,000 tokens
Max input192,000 tokens
Max output128,000 tokens
Input modalitiesText
Output modalitiesText
Architecture295B total / 21B active MoE (192 experts, top-8) + 3.8B MTP
Toolsdeep thinking, function calling, JSON output, streaming, cache, MCP

Hy3 exposes reasoning_effort with no_think, low, and high. The GA release moved to flat, non-tiered pricing on TokenHub, replacing Preview's input-length tiers; hy3-preview remains available separately with its original tiered pricing. See live pricing in the model catalog.

Architecture and efficiency

Hy3 is a dense-MoE hybrid decoder-only model: the first layer uses dense FFN, later MoE layers route each token to 8 of 192 experts, and the architecture uses sigmoid routing, QK-Norm, and GQA (64 attention heads / 8 KV heads). An MTP layer supports speculative decoding. GA did not change this architecture — the three-month gap between Preview and GA went into post-training: more compute, higher-quality and more diverse data, and finer hallucination detection and constraints.

Benchmarks

Tencent's GA disclosures focus on coding and agent gains, head-to-head comparisons with peer models, and reliability numbers from live products, rather than re-publishing STEM/long-context benchmark suites.

Coding and agent gains over Preview

Coding & Agents

The biggest upgrade over Preview

SkillsBench
29.1 → 55.3
Tops the public leaderboard
MathArena Apex
12.8 → 38.7
Structured reasoning tasks
SWE-bench Pro
46.0 → 57.9
Repo-level real-world coding
NL2repo
35.3 → 45.6
Natural language to full repo

Numbers show Preview → GA; Tencent summarizes the overall gain as 20%-30%.

Versus Preview: SkillsBench rises from 29.1 to 55.3, MathArena Apex from 12.8 to 38.7, SWE-bench Pro from 46.0 to 57.9, and NL2repo from 35.3 to 45.6. Tencent summarizes the overall agent-and-code improvement as 20%–30%.

Head-to-head comparisons

Head-to-head

Versus DeepSeek V4 Pro, Qwen3.7 Max, and GPT-5.5

ClawEval pass³
68.5
DeepSeek V4 Pro 62.4 · Qwen3.7 Max 65.2
BrowseComp
84.2
GPT-5.5 84.4
SWE-bench Verified
78.0
SWE-bench Multilingual 75.8
Terminal-Bench 2.1
71.7
SkillsBench 55.3, ranks first

All numbers are Hy3 GA scores reported independently.

ClawEval pass³ reaches 68.5, ahead of DeepSeek V4 Pro (62.4) and Qwen3.7 Max (65.2); SkillsBench's 55.3 tops the public leaderboard; BrowseComp scores 84.2, close to GPT-5.5's 84.4. GA also reports SWE-bench Verified 78.0, SWE-bench Multilingual 75.8, and Terminal-Bench 2.1 at 71.7.

Reliability and real product deployment

Reliability & Production

Live validation from Tencent’s own products

Hallucination rate
~50% lower
~44% lower in long-doc/RAG scenarios
WorkBuddy task success
72% → 90%
34% lower average latency
ima agent stability
95.1%
~19% net gain in answer quality
WeGame tool orchestration
92%
Hallucinations 4.5% → 2.8%

Numbers come from Yuanbao, WorkBuddy, ima, and WeGame production feedback, not offline benchmarks.

Overall hallucination rate drops about 50%, and about 44% in long-document/RAG scenarios. In Tencent's own products, WorkBuddy's task success rate rises from 72% to 90% with 34% lower average latency; ima's agent system reaches 95.1% stability with nearly 19% net gain in answer quality; and the WeGame assistant's multi-turn tool-orchestration success rate climbs to 92% with hallucinations down from 4.5% to 2.8%. These are live production numbers, not offline benchmark scores.

When to use it

  • Agent workflows: office and life automation (data processing, document generation, research analysis, information lookup, web page creation), with a disclosed 90% task success rate.
  • Coding assistants: cross-file code reading/editing, debugging, and front-end tasks, with clear gains over Preview on SWE/Terminal-style benchmarks.
  • Long-document processing: 256K context and 192K max input for contracts, research reports, and long code contexts.
  • Reliability-sensitive use cases: sharply lower hallucination rates suit customer support and knowledge-base Q&A.
  • Chinese product integrations: Yuanbao, ima, WorkBuddy, QQ, and Tencent Docs already validate low-latency, high-success-rate deployment.

CrossModel exposes Hy3 GA through OpenAI-compatible /v1/chat/completions and Anthropic-compatible /v1/messages; the earlier hy3-preview remains available as a separate configuration. Current pricing is available in the model catalog.