GLM-5.3-Flash
z-ai/glm-5.3-flash
Back to model catalog

Z.ai · Model guide

GLM-5.3-Flash

Compare
z-ai/glm-5.3-flashReleased Aug 26, 202650% off

The first natively multimodal model in the GLM-5 series. A 320B-parameter mixture of experts that activates 18B per token, it combines sparse and linear attention and folds vision directly into the coding loop, so it can inspect rendered output, interfaces and documents while it works. It targets frontend and long-horizon agentic engineering as well as Office and financial document workflows, across a 1M-token context.

Modalities
TextImageVideoText
Context
1M
Max output
128K
Price / 1M tokens
$ 0.15$ 0.075in$ 0.25out
StreamingTool callingJSON outputImage inputThinking mode

What this model is good at

What the vendor positions it for, and which of our models to reach for instead.

VendorZ.AI positions it as the first natively multimodal model in the GLM-5 series, reaching stronger intelligence than GLM-5.2 through a hybrid sparse and linear attention architecture.source

Best for
  • Visual coding loop · Vision is integrated natively into the coding loop, so the model can inspect its own rendered output and interaction feedback and refine frontend, game and 3D work.(vendor claim)source

  • Long-horizon agentic engineering · The official comparison reports Terminal-Bench 2.1, DeepSWE v1.1 and Toolathlon Verified well above GLM-5.2.source

  • Office and financial documents · The vendor extends it to Office, financial research and professional document work, delivering PPTX, PDF, DOCX and XLSX artefacts.(vendor claim)source

Neighbouring models
  • z-ai/glm-5.3sibling —Choose GLM-5.3 for the text-only flagship tuned for complex software engineering and cybersecurity work.
  • z-ai/glm-5.2predecessor —Use GLM-5.2 when the application must be able to turn thinking off.
Compare them side by side →

Pricing and billing

Billed per token. Cached input is charged at the cache-read rate.

Price / 1M tokensYou pay
Input$ 0.15$ 0.075
Output$ 0.50$ 0.25
Cache read$ 0.030$ 0.015
Cache write$ 0.15$ 0.075
Estimate a request
$ 0.0013
Estimated cost per request
10.0K × $ 0.075
+ 2.0K × $ 0.25
≈ $ 1.25 per 1,000 requests

Capabilities and limits

What CrossModel guarantees across every route this model can take right now.

Context window
1.0M tokens
Max output
128.0K tokens
Input / output modalities
Text + Image + Video → Text
Streaming
Supported
Tool calling
Supported
Structured output (JSON)
Supported
Image input
Supported
Thinking mode
Supported· always on
Reasoning effort
low · high · max
Available endpoints
/v1/chat/completions · /v1/responses · /v1/messages

Published benchmarks

Scores the vendor reported, with the evaluation setup each one came from.

Agentic coding
  • Terminal-Bench 2.1
    pass_rate·Z.AI · 2026-08-26Claude Code 2.1.207setup not fully disclosed

    官方脚注给出 6 小时超时。

    84.3%
Agentic work
  • Agents' Last Exam (CLI)
    score·Z.AI · 2026-08-26effort maxClaude Codesetup not fully disclosed

    按官方 ALE 评测协议、由官方评测器打分;1M 上下文,Tool Search 关闭。

    26.3%
  • AutomationBench v1.0.6
    score·Z.AI · 2026-08-26setup not fully disclosed

    评测于 AutomationBench v1.0.6,并合入 PR #13 对 null 类型处理的修复;与未标版本的 AutomationBench 结果不可直接比较。

    48.8%
Coding
  • DeepSWE 1.1
    resolved_rate·Z.AI · 2026-08-26mini-swe-agentsetup not fully disclosed

    官方脚注给出 6 小时超时与 400K 上下文。

    63.4%
  • NL2Repo
    score·Z.AI · 2026-08-26setup not fully disclosed

    1M 上下文下评测;官方用规则与 LLM 双重判定拦截未授权的 pip / curl 等作弊行为。

    56.3%
Document understanding
  • OfficeQA Pro
    score·Z.AI · 2026-08-26setup not fully disclosed

    在 Treasury Bulletin PDF 语料上评测,且不提供 PDF 内嵌文本;最大上下文 512K。

    62.4%
Knowledge work
  • GDPval-AA v2
    elo·Z.AI · 2026-08-26setup not fully disclosed

    由 Artificial Analysis 评测,Z.AI 在官方发布对比中转载。

    1773
Reasoning
  • AA Intelligence Index v4.1.1
    score·Z.AI · 2026-08-26enabledsetup not fully disclosed

    Artificial Analysis 的九项复合指数,不是百分比;Z.AI 在发布页转载该分数,未披露各分项的可复现设置。

    57
  • Humanity's Last Exam (with tools)
    accuracy·Z.AI · 2026-08-26setup not fully disclosed

    全集评测,最大上下文 300K 并启用上下文管理策略,判分模型为 GPT-5.6-luna (medium);官方未列出完整工具集合。

    55.3%
Tool use
  • Toolathlon Verified
    pass_rate·Z.AI · 2026-08-263 runssetup not fully disclosed

    经官方评测服务取得,pass@1 取 3 次独立运行的平均值。

    78.4%
Video understanding
  • MMVU
    accuracy·Z.AI · 2026-08-26setup not fully disclosed

    最大上下文 256K;原生支持视频输入的模型直接喂入原始视频,不支持的按 1 fps 抽帧。

    80.5%

Vendor-reported numbers, not CrossModel measurements. Scores are only comparable when the benchmark version, metric and evaluation setup match, so nothing here is averaged or ranked.

Use it in your tools

Point the base URL at CrossModel and paste this model ID — every tool below has a setup guide.

See all integration guides →

Frequently asked questions

What is GLM-5.3-Flash?
GLM-5.3-Flash is available on CrossModel as z-ai/glm-5.3-flash. It has a 1M-token context window and can return up to 128K tokens per request.
How much does GLM-5.3-Flash cost?
Currently $ 0.075 per 1M input tokens and $ 0.25 per 1M output tokens. Cached input is billed at $ 0.015 per 1M.
Does GLM-5.3-Flash support tool calling and structured output?
Tool calling: Supported · Structured output (JSON): Supported · Image input: Supported · Streaming: Supported · Thinking mode: Supported
Which endpoint do I call?
For text models, OpenAI Chat Completions (/v1/chat/completions), OpenAI Responses (/v1/responses) and Anthropic Messages (/v1/messages) all work — pick whichever your SDK already speaks.
Can I try it without writing code?
Yes. Sign in and open the Playground on this page to chat with the model directly — no API key needed. Usage is billed from your wallet at the normal rate.

Chat first, integrate later

Chat first, then wire it in once you like the answers.