Anthropic · Model guide
Claude Opus 5
The fifth-generation Opus, and Anthropic's everyday frontier model for agentic coding, knowledge work, computer use and long-running tasks. Effort runs across five levels, and at the top two thinking can no longer be switched off. Anthropic reports it behind Mythos 5 on cybersecurity work.
What this model is good at
What the vendor positions it for, and which of our models to reach for instead.
VendorFor complex agentic coding and enterprise work.source
Agentic coding · Anthropic reports it state of the art on its Frontier-Bench coding evaluation.(vendor claim)source
Professional knowledge work · Anthropic reports it state of the art on GDPval-AA.(vendor claim)source
Scientific research · Anthropic reports gains over Opus 4.8 on every one of its life sciences evaluations.(vendor claim)source
- anthropic/claude-fable-5stronger —Fable 5 is the stronger model when cost is not the constraint.
- anthropic/claude-sonnet-5cheaper —Sonnet 5 covers most agent work at 40 percent of the input price.
- anthropic/claude-opus-4-8predecessor —Opus 4.8 is the one Anthropic still recommends for cybersecurity work needing reduced guardrails.(vendor claim)source
Pricing and billing
Billed per token. Cached input is charged at the cache-read rate.
| Price / 1M tokens | You pay |
|---|---|
| Input | $ 5.00 |
| Output | $ 25.00 |
| Cache read | $ 0.50 |
| Cache write | $ 6.25 |
+ 2.0K × $ 25.00
Capabilities and limits
What CrossModel guarantees across every route this model can take right now.
- Context window
- 1.0M tokens
- Max output
- 128.0K tokens
- Input / output modalities
- Text + Image → Text
- Streaming
- Supported
- Tool calling
- Supported
- Structured output (JSON)
- Supported
- Image input
- Supported
- Thinking mode
- Supported· can be turned off
- Reasoning effort
- low · medium · high · xhigh · max
- Available endpoints
- /v1/chat/completions · /v1/responses · /v1/messages
- reasoning.toggle is unavailable when Reasoning effort=xhigh,max source
Published benchmarks
Scores the vendor reported, with the evaluation setup each one came from.
- Frontier-Bench v0.1score·Anthropic · 2026-07-24setup not fully disclosed
Anthropic's footnote for the accompanying effort plot describes an internal run on the mini-SWE-agent harness with a GKE backend, mean reward over five attempts per task, with Opus 4.8 as the safety-classifier fallback.
43.3% - 53.4%
Vendor-reported numbers, not CrossModel measurements. Scores are only comparable when the benchmark version, metric and evaluation setup match, so nothing here is averaged or ranked.
Use it in your tools
Point the base URL at CrossModel and paste this model ID — every tool below has a setup guide.
Frequently asked questions
What is Claude Opus 5?
How much does Claude Opus 5 cost?
Does Claude Opus 5 support tool calling and structured output?
Which endpoint do I call?
Can I try it without writing code?
Chat first, integrate later
Chat first, then wire it in once you like the answers.